Analysis of Financial Statement Fraud Detection Using the Fraud Triangle Theory
Empirical Study on Construction Companies Listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange for the Period 2019–2023
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37278/eprofit.v8i1.1498Kata Kunci:
Fraudulent Financial Reporting, Fraud Triangle Theory, Financial Stability, Nature of Industry, Auditor Change, Construction CompaniesAbstrak
Financial statement fraud has become increasingly prevalent compared to other types of fraud, such as corruption and asset misappropriation, posing significant risks to the credibility of financial reporting and stakeholder decision-making. The urgency of this study arises from the increasing complexity of financial transactions and the vulnerability of the construction sector to manipulation due to its project-based nature, large contract values, and high estimation uncertainty. These conditions create opportunities for fraudulent financial reporting that may not be easily detected, thereby necessitating empirical examination of key risk factors. Therefore, this study aims to examine the effect of financial stability, nature of industry, and change in auditor on fraudulent financial reporting in construction companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange during the period 2019–2023. The data used in this study were obtained from the annual financial statements of construction companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange from 2019 to 2023. The sample consists of 85 observations from 17 companies over a five-year period. The sampling technique employed was non-probability sampling using a purposive sampling method. To analyze the effect of the variables, classical assumption tests and panel data regression analysis using the common effect model were applied. The results show that financial stability, nature of industry, and change in auditor collectively explain fraudulent financial reporting. However, the partial test results indicate that only the nature of industry has a significant effect in detecting fraudulent financial reporting, while financial stability and change in auditor do not have a significant effect on the detection of fraudulent financial reporting.
Referensi
D. E. Kieso, J. J. Weygandt, and T. D. Warfield, Akuntansi Keuangan Menengah. Jakarta: Salemba Empat, 2018.
ACFE, The Nations Occupational Fraud 2024 : A Report to the Nations. 2024.
Bappenas, “Pedoman Reformasi Perencanaan dan Penganggaran.” Bappenas dan Departemen Keuangan Republik Indonesia., 2009.
D. R. Cressey, Other People’s Money: A Study in the Social Psychology of Embezzlement. Glencoe: IL: Free Press, 1953.
M. Annisya, Lindrianasari, and Y. Asmaranti, “PENDETEKSIAN KECURANG LAPORAN KEUANGAN MENGGUNAKAN FRAUD DIAMOND,” vol. 23, no. 1, 2016.
R. Herdiana and S. P. Sari, “Analisis fraud diamond dalam mendeteksi financial statement fraud (studi empiris pada perusahaan manufaktur yang terdaftar di bursa efek indonesia periode 2015-2017.,” 2018.
S. Apriliana and L. Agustina, “The Analysis of Fraudulent Financial Reporting Determinant through Fraud Pentagon Approach,” jda, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 154–165, Sep. 2017, doi: 10.15294/jda.v7i1.4036.
R. D. Agustina and D. Pratomo, “Pengaruh Fraud Pentagon dalam Mendeteksi Kecurangan Pelaporan Keuangan,” pp. 44–62, 2019.
A. Abrori, U. Purwohedi, and M. Yusuf, “Digital Transformation in the Local Tax System: Does It Strengthen Key Factors of Tax Compliance?,” J. Bina Praja, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 687–701, 2024, doi: 10.21787/jbp.16.2024.687-701.
L. D. Yanti and I. B. Riharjo, “PENDETEKSI KECURANGAN PELAPORAN KEUANGAN MENGGUNAKAN,” vol. 10, 2021.
S. Sunardi and M. N. Amin, “Fraud detection of financial statement by using fraud diamond perspective,” 2018.
D. T. Manurung and A. L. Hardika, “Analysis of factors that influence financial statement fraud in the perspective fraud diamond: Empirical study on banking companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange year 2012 to 2014.,” 2015.
W. Schroeder, P. Oliva, L. Giglio, and I. A. Csiszar, “The New VIIRS 375 m active fire detection data product: Algorithm description and initial assessment,” Remote Sensing of Environment, vol. 143, pp. 85–96, Mar. 2014, doi: 10.1016/j.rse.2013.12.008.
E. S. Hendriksen and Brenda. Michael F van, Accounting Theory., 5th ed. Batam: Interaksa, 2000.
A. Abbas, “Earnings Management in Banking Industry And Its Impact on The Firm Value,” Akrual J. Akunt., vol. 10, no. 1, p. 69, Oct. 2018, doi: 10.26740/jaj.v10n1.p69-84.
C. J. Skousen, K. R. Smith, and C. J. Wright, “Detecting and Predicting Financial Statement Fraud: The Effectiveness of the Fraud Triangle and SAS No. 99,” SSRN Journal, 2008, doi: 10.2139/ssrn.1295494.
S. R. Nor Aini Aprilia and A. Furqani, “DETEKSI KECURANGAN LAPORAN KEUANGAN DENGAN METODE FRAUD DIAMOND PADA PERUSAHAAN JASA,” JAFIS, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 1–11, Oct. 2021, doi: 10.24929/jafis.v2i2.1661.
L. Tiffani and M. Marfuah, “Deteksi financial statement fraud dengan analisis fraud triangle pada perusahaan manufaktur yang terdaftar di bursa efek Indonesia,” jaai, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 112–125, Dec. 2015, doi: 10.20885/jaai.vol19.iss2.art3.
S. A. Kayoi, “FAKTOR-FAKTOR YANG MEMPENGARUHI FINANCIAL STATEMENT FRAUD DITINJAU DARI FRAUD TRIANGLE PADA PERUSAHAAN MANUFAKTUR DI BURSA EFEK INDONESIA PERIODE 2015-2017,” 2019.
R. R. Utami, Y. Murni, and W. Azizah, “Pengaruh Financial Target, Ineffective Monitoring, Pergantian Auditor, dan Perubahan Direksi Terhadap Kecurangan Laporan Keuangan,” WIDYAKALA JOURNAL, vol. 9, no. 2, p. 99, Sep. 2022, doi: 10.36262/widyakala.v9i2.572.
H. S. Rukmana and B. O. Nababan, Determinan Fraud Pentagon : Teori dan Aplikasi, Edisi Pert. Yogyakarta: Selat Media Patners, 2024.
C. J. Skousen, K. R. Smith, and C. J. Wright, “Detecting and Predicting Financial Statement Fraud: the Effectiveness of the Fraud Traingle and SAS No. 99,” no. 99, 2008.
##submission.downloads##
Diterbitkan
Cara Mengutip
Terbitan
Bagian
Lisensi
Hak Cipta (c) 2026 Alya Luthfiyyah, Sulthan Yusuf Abdullah, Taufik Ridwan, Muhamad Lutfi Hakim

Artikel ini berlisensiCreative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish articles in Economics Professional in Action (E-Profit) agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright of the article and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a CC-BY-SA or The Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
